🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “complete double standards” for opposing anti-smoking regulations in Africa that currently exist in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

Correspondence acquired by reporters sent from the company’s subsidiary in Zambia to the African officials requests proposals to prohibit tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be canceled or deferred.

The corporation is pursuing modifications of a draft bill that include reductions in the proposed size of visual health alerts on cigarette packaging, the removal of restrictions on scented cigarette varieties, and watered-down penalties for any companies violating the new laws.

Health advocate reaction

“Were I in government, I would say that they allow the safeguarding of the British people and perpetuate the death of the Zambian people,” stated the anti-tobacco campaigner.

More than 7,000 Zambians a year pass away from tobacco-related illnesses, according to WHO calculations.

Chimbala said the letter was believed to have been distributed to multiple official agencies and was in distribution within public interest organizations.

Worldwide lobbying patterns

This occurs during broader worries about business sector influence with medical guidelines. Last month, WHO officials raised concerns that the smoking product companies was increasing attempts to weaken global control measures.

“There is proof of corporate influence globally. Tobacco company fingerprints are on deferred levy rises in Indonesia, delayed regulations in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN high-level meeting,” stated the corporate monitoring director.

Potential consequences

“Should anti-smoking legislation doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the cost might be borne in lives of people who might otherwise quit smoking.”

The anti-smoking legislation being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes measures that exceed UK legislation by extending coverage to e-cigarettes, and stipulating that visual health alerts cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Business countermeasures

Through correspondence, BAT suggests this be lowered to 30% or 50% “according to global suggested parameters”, delayed for at least twelve months after the legislation is approved.

International experts specifically advises a alert needs to encompass at least fifty percent of the product container front “and attempt to encompass as much of the main visible surfaces as possible”. In the UK, warnings need to encompass nearly two-thirds of a product container sides.

Flavored tobacco discussion

The company seeks the removal of broad restrictions on flavoured tobacco products, suggesting that it would lead smokers to “black market” products. The company proposes banning a limited selection of “scents derived from desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The proposed legislation suggests penalties for different infractions “ranging from a percentage of annual turnover to a decade in prison”.

Company justification

Through correspondence, the managing director of the African subsidiary says the firm is “committed to ethical business practices” and “backs the goals of governments to decrease cigarette consumption and the related medical consequences” but maintains that “some regulations can have undesirable and unforeseen outcomes.”

Campaigner rebuttal

Chimbala said the company's suggested modifications would “dilute these regulations so much that the required influence for it to cause long-term change in society will not be achieved”.

The fact that many such provisions operated within the UK, where the corporation is based, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he said.

“We exist in a international community. Should I grow cigarettes in my back yard and gather the crop and market the products – and my children do not consume tobacco, but my neighbor's family uses … to benefit personally and all the future family lines while my neighbor's family are perishing … is in itself total emotional collapse.”

Anti-smoking regulations in the Britain or other nations had failed to shutter businesses, the advocate mentioned. “Regulations don't close the industry. It only protects the people.”

Standard business position

The company representative stated: “BAT Zambia conducts its operations according with relevant national regulations. Additionally, the firm contributes in the country’s legislative process in line with the appropriate structures which provide for interested party involvement in policymaking.”

The firm positioned itself as “not against rules”, they said, adding that young individuals should be shielded from obtaining cigarettes and nicotine.

“We champion developing rules to accomplish desired public health goals, while recognizing the range of privileges and responsibilities on businesses, users and involved parties,” the spokesperson stated, adding that BAT’s proposals “represent the situation of the African nation's economy and smoking product business, which involves growing volumes of illicit trade”.

Zambia’s department of trade, commerce and industry was approached for comment.