Russia Seeks Substantial Sum in Compensation from Clearing House Regarding Frozen Assets

Russia's monetary authority has announced it is seeking compensation valued at $230 billion from the financial institution Euroclear. This move is a clear response by the Kremlin regarding proposals to utilize immobilized Russian state funds to support Ukraine.

The Legal Claim

Based on reports in local news outlets, the monetary authority initiated a claim last week for an estimated 18 trillion roubles. This figure is equivalent to the aforementioned $230 billion claim.

European Union officials will decide in the coming days on a proposal to use around €210 billion in immobilized Russian state funds. This scheme entails granting Ukraine with a substantial loan to fund its defence and financial needs.

The vast majority of these assets, totaling €185 billion, are held at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. Euroclear serves as the main keeper for the Russian frozen sovereign wealth.

A Clash Over Legality

European Union officials have argued that their proposal is on solid legal ground. They argue is based on the principle that ownership of the sovereign wealth still belongs to Russia, even though it was immobilized in European jurisdictions shortly after the full-scale military offensive of Ukraine.

Moscow, however, has labeled any use of the assets as theft. Authorities have warned of reciprocal measures, including seizing European corporate assets within Russia.

Kirill Dmitriev, a figure who has assumed a prominent position in peace negotiations, wrote on a social media platform that Russia "will prevail in court" and regain its funds. He added that the European Union, the common currency, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the proposal.

Strategic Positioning

In comments interpreted as an attempt to create division between Europe and the United States, the official characterized the proposal as "a severe assault on property rights and the global financial system created by the United States."

The clearing house declined to comment on the latest legal action. The institution has in the past noted it is contending with over 100 legal cases in Russian courts.

Legal Hurdles Ahead

While judges in European nations are not expected to enforce judgments from Russian courts, analysts expect Moscow to pursue implementation in nations with stronger relations to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities may attempt to implement a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly states, if relevant assets can be located," stated a lawyer from an NSP law firm.

European Safeguards

EU officials said they are developing steps to discourage other countries from aiding any Russian legal action against EU entities. They are also crafting safeguards to protect EU member states with investments in Russia from what they term "illegal expropriation."

The Proposed Loan Mechanism

According to the detailed scheme, the EU would issue an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, using the proceeds generated from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's ownership claim on the underlying funds would remain unaffected.

Kyiv would solely be obligated to repay the money in the event that Russia agreed to pay compensation for the vast destruction inflicted during the ongoing war.

Alternative Proposals

The Belgian government, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to consider an different method for funding Ukraine. This entails joint EU debt issuance to fund a loan, using unused funds within the European budget.

This alternative move, nevertheless, requires unanimity among all 27 member states. The Hungarian government, considered friendly with the Kremlin, has already expressed its objection.

Commenting on Monday, the EU top diplomat, a senior official, said the reparations loan as "the strongest solution" for supporting Ukraine. "The reparations loan is based on the Russian frozen assets, meaning it doesn't come from our public funds, which is also important," she stated. "Furthermore, it sends a clear message that if you do all this destruction to another country, you must pay for the reparations."
Marisa Garcia
Marisa Garcia

A tech strategist with over a decade of experience in digital transformation and business innovation.