Judicial Body Confirms Guilty Verdict for Political Rival Pritam Singh
In a significant court decision, Singapore's main political rival Pritam Singh has failed in his challenge against a guilty verdict of lying to a parliamentary committee.
In February, Singh was fined S$14,000 for two charges related to his handling of former lawmaker Raeesah Khan, who had confessed to lying in parliament.
During a short hearing before a full public gallery on Friday, the presiding judge declared that the evidence presented justified Singh's conviction.
Leader's Response
Singh, who heads the main opposition Workers' Party, expressed that he was "disheartened" with the decision but accepted it "completely and unequivocally".
He settled his fines at the court complex after the hearing. "Might as well get it done," he commented to the press.
Despite the conviction, Singh retains his seat in parliament and stated his commitment to keep working for Singaporeans alongside his colleagues.
Background of the Case
The controversy began in 2021 when Raeesah Khan asserted in parliament that she had seen police misbehave towards a survivor.
She later admitted her account was fabricated, but testified during a parliamentary committee investigation that party leaders, such as Singh, had instructed her to "stick to the story" even though they were aware it was a lie.
Khan has since stepped down from both the party and parliament. She was fined S$35,000 for perjury and misusing her legislative immunity.
Judicial Reasoning
In February, the court determined that Singh's actions were "highly suggestive" that he did not want Khan to correct the falsehood.
Singh, who protested his innocence throughout the trial, countered that he had wanted to give Khan time to deal with what was a delicate issue.
Points Contested
During the November court session, Singh's lawyer argued that the initial court had "ignored crucial pieces of evidence" in its original ruling.
The defense also sought to cast doubt on the reliability of Khan and her aides, who served as witnesses.
When asked why Singh appeared to be "taking no action" to have Khan confess in the weeks after learning of her lie, his lawyer stated that he had other pressing commitments to manage.
The state's attorneys, however, maintained that Singh's inaction, coupled with other evidence, proved he never wanted Khan to come clean.
Broader Context
Singh's case is significant as one of the very few criminal convictions against a current opposition parliamentarian.
Observers have in the past alleged Singapore's government of using the judiciary to pursue its political opponents—charges that the government have always rejected.
The Workers' Party is the sole rival group in Singapore's present legislature, where it holds 12 out of 99 seats.